Northwest Lichenologists

photomorphs

  • 13 Dec 2020 11:03 AM
    Message # 9426649

    I find photomorphs interesting and beautiful, and can’t resist repeatedly photographing them. (The spouse of a geology professor liked to remind us that the word interesting and the word beautiful, which we tended to use interchangeably, are not synonymous.) There is a place in Sharpe Park, on Fidalgo Island, Skagit County, WA, where over many years we have always found the photomorphs of Peltigera britannica. They grow relatively quickly and come and go. This year we found cyanomorphs which appeared to have arisen independently of any phycomorph. One which must have been very small a year previously had in one year grown to about 10cm diameter -

    https://northwest-lichenologists.wildapricot.org/page-1816539/132229682#photo

    Another apparent instance of independently arisen cyanomorphs was of Peltigera venosa north of Mt Townsend, Clallam County, WA (there were several other smaller patches of cyanomorphs scattered around -

    https://northwest-lichenologists.wildapricot.org/page-1816539/132229669#photo

    Far more often when I have encountered cyanomorphs they appear to have arisen as lobes developing from an initial phycomorph (secondary phycomorphs then develop from the cyanomorphs) (assume the cyanomorphs begin as cephalodia) -

    https://northwest-lichenologists.wildapricot.org/page-1816539/132229679#photo

    https://northwest-lichenologists.wildapricot.org/page-1816539/132229660#photo


    I don’t know if cyanomorphs arising independently is all that unusual or of any significance. I do wonder why photomorphs are so abundant at the place in Sharpe Park. Haven’t noticed free-living Nostoc there, or other cyanolichens. (3 or 4 species of cyanolichens occur together on several rocks elsewhere in Sharpe Park.) Could it be a genetic attribute of the Peltigera brittanica at that location?

    Last modified: 13 Dec 2020 11:28 AM | Richard Droker
  • 14 Dec 2020 9:29 AM
    Reply # 9428892 on 9426649

    Richard, you keep us all on our toes thinking about and looking for the things you see! I am surprised to see (if that IS what I am seeing) P venosa cyanomorph - I have not seen those before.



  • 14 Dec 2020 1:53 PM
    Reply # 9429746 on 9426649

    Almost never can I resist photographing P. venosa, “Without a doubt the cutest little Peltigera” according to McCune and Geiser (2009). Looked at their description again (goes to show it is worthwhile to read through about even the easiest to identify lichens) to find “If you look closely at the soil around these individuals you might find the blue-green photomorph of P. venosa, the fungus associated only with the blue-green partner and lacking green algae.” Thereafter the cyanomorph, long overlooked, was not hard to find, and exceptional at the location north of Mt Townsend.


    Just now looking further Smith et al. (2009) The Lichens of Great Britain and Ireland has “A blue-green morphotype of P. venosa frequently occurs separately or sometimes with the green morphotype; this consists of small, ± ascending, overlapping, brown-black squamules, up to 1 mm long, semi-circular or ligulate, photobiont Nostoc, evenly distributed throughout the inner part of the lobe. This phase resembles extreme, compacted, reduced morphs of Leptogium gelatinosum and other small Leptogium species.” Daphne - please let me know if you see those. (Occurring separately would be difficult to identify.)


    Also find (although not able to access the paper) “Tonsberg & Holtan-Hartwig (1983) observed that the green cephalodiate thalli of Peltigera venosa were often associated on the substratum with a brown or black layer developing into small black squamules. Normal thalli, containing green algae, seemed to grow from this dark crust, which contained cyanobacteria and could be interpreted as the second member of a photosymbiodeme. Tonsberg & Holtan-Hartwig (1983) considered a more detailed examination of the early stages to be necessary. The complex system of developmental pathways and morphogenetic interactions expressed in the two morphologies of Peltigera venosa is the subject of this paper.” - https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Photosymbiodemes-and-their-Development-in-Peltigera-Ott/27b3767a9564dbdb5b5932b63cb75729cd40deef Seems to indicate the cyanomorph preceeds the phycomorph.


    Interesting the degree to which the photomorphs of P. venosa differ from one another as compared to P. britannica and P. aphthosa, on a spectrum somewhat between them and the dendriscocauloid cyanomorphs.


    Last modified: 14 Dec 2020 4:53 PM | Richard Droker
  • 14 Dec 2020 6:55 PM
    Reply # 9430349 on 9426649
    Bruce McCune (Administrator)

    For whatever reason, I believe there ARE places that tend to favor cyanomorphs of Peltigera britannica. I have been visiting a particular trail in the Cascade Range for over 20 years and can always find the cyanomorphs and chimeras as you depict. Many years ago Bruce Caldwell and I submitted proposals to NSF to study some aspects of the physiology of these, in particular differences in phosphatase enzymes between the bluegreen and green morphs. Although we had good reviews, we were never funded. Oh well, maybe someone else will pick up on this system. To me it is fascinating that the symbiosis can thrive with a given fungus and either one of two different Kingdoms or both. All kinds of possibilities are there for understanding how such different organisms interact.

© Northwest Lichenologists

NWL Privacy Policy

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software